<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>

<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns:atom10='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<channel>
  <title>Rick Scott</title>
  <link>https://rickscott.dreamwidth.org/</link>
  <description>Rick Scott - Dreamwidth Studios</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 00:10:17 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / Dreamwidth Studios</generator>
  <lj:journal>rickscott</lj:journal>
  <lj:journaltype>personal</lj:journaltype>
  

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://rickscott.dreamwidth.org/3020.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 00:10:17 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Coming to terms with terms</title>
  <link>https://rickscott.dreamwidth.org/3020.html</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;
Precision in choosing words is important.  Shared understanding of what
words mean forms the basis of language.  If we don&apos;t have that
shared understanding, we can&apos;t communicate.  That being said, humans
are messy and inexact beings.  We&apos;re prone to nuance and ambiguity.  
Words aren&apos;t installed in our brains directly from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_English_Dictionary&quot;&gt;OED&lt;/a&gt;; they 
accrete meaning over a period of years.  No two people are ever going to
definitively agree on what a word means, simply because we can&apos;t
burrow into each other&apos;s heads and start rearranging things.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
It&apos;s a waste of time to try to nail down a word&apos;s definition beyond 
any shadow of a doubt, especially when you&apos;re trying to nail it to
the inside of somebody else&apos;s skull.  On several occasions, I&apos;ve seen
what could have been a very productive discussion derailed by an
intellectual death spiral where people slug it out over the exact meaning 
of some term.  Better to agree on a provisional definition that will
suit the conversation at hand and move on to discussing matters of  
greater substance.  
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=rickscott&amp;ditemid=3020&quot; width=&quot;30&quot; height=&quot;12&quot; alt=&quot;comment count unavailable&quot; style=&quot;vertical-align: middle;&quot;/&gt; comments</description>
  <comments>https://rickscott.dreamwidth.org/3020.html</comments>
  <category>flamewars</category>
  <category>diction</category>
  <category>terminology</category>
  <category>precision</category>
  <category>writing</category>
  <category>arguing</category>
  <category>definitions</category>
  <category>language</category>
  <category>folly</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>1</lj:reply-count>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
