<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dw="https://www.dreamwidth.org">
  <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2010-05-25:518129</id>
  <title>Rick Scott</title>
  <subtitle>Testing, hacking, and Open Source</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>Rick Scott</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rickscott.dreamwidth.org/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://rickscott.dreamwidth.org/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2012-08-27T13:37:00Z</updated>
  <dw:journal username="rickscott" type="personal"/>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2010-05-25:518129:8073</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rickscott.dreamwidth.org/8073.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://rickscott.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=8073"/>
    <title>Curated Articles Wrapup for July 2012</title>
    <published>2012-08-27T13:33:07Z</published>
    <updated>2012-08-27T13:37:00Z</updated>
    <category term="stickyminds"/>
    <category term="published article"/>
    <category term="bug chaining"/>
    <category term="workpeopleage"/>
    <category term="writing"/>
    <category term="curated pieces wrapup"/>
    <category term="security"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;
In the last couple of months I've started a new writing gig with
&lt;a href="http://www.sqe.com/"&gt;SQE&lt;/a&gt; -- the folks who publish
&lt;em&gt;Better Software&lt;/em&gt; magazine, 
run
&lt;a href="http://stickyminds.com"&gt;StickyMinds.com&lt;/a&gt; and
&lt;a href="http://techwell.com"&gt;TechWell&lt;/a&gt;, 
and have 
published 
&lt;a href="http://rickscott.dreamwidth.org/tag/stickyminds"&gt;several
of my articles&lt;/a&gt; before.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
They're calling it a &lt;em&gt;curation&lt;/em&gt; gig. We'll be serving up
frequent short pieces linking to other interesting opinions or 
resources from anywhere on the web.  So far, I'm really liking this format
-- not only do we get to highlight some of the most helpful 
and insightful things that are out there, it also gives us the chance
to expand on them, put them in context, or compare different approaches
to tackling a difficult problem.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
At any rate, I hope you find these pieces useful and worthwhile!
Here's a recap of mine for July 2012.
&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        &lt;a href="http://www.stickyminds.com/s.asp?F=S17500_ART_2"&gt;Leaked Passwords and Better Security Practices&lt;/a&gt; (2 July 2012): 
        Password security was in the news a great deal in June, with 
        LinkedIn, eHarmony, and Last.fm all having their insecurely-stored
        password databases leaked onto the public internet.
        Here's a quick review of the very basics of secure password
        storage. 
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        &lt;a href="http://www.stickyminds.com/s.asp?F=S17525_ART_2"&gt;The Independent Double-check&lt;/a&gt; (19 July 2012):
        Nobody is perfect.  In my former job as an artillery soldier, 
        the way we dealt with this was making sure every crucial thing
        was independently checked by at least two people.  As testers,
        we need to do the same thing, even when someone with more 
        authority than us insists the code is correct.
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        &lt;a href="http://www.stickyminds.com/s.asp?F=S17542_ART_2"&gt;Bug Chaining&lt;/a&gt; (31 July 2012): 
        Bug chaining is an idea from the security world that hasn't 
        gotten much traction in the wider QA/testing community yet. 
        Assuming that all bugs are orthogonal to each other is a 
        mistake -- sometimes two minors make a showstopper. 
    &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=rickscott&amp;ditemid=8073" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
